RigPlan.app

ROE Visual RB2.6F vs SiliconCore Peony 2.6

2.604 mm against 2.604 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

ROE Visual RB2.6FSiliconCore Peony 2.6
ManufacturerROE VisualSiliconCore
Pixel pitch2.604 mm2.604 mm
Cabinet500 × 500 mm500 × 500 mm
Brightness2,500 nits1,700 nits
Refresh rate7,680 Hz3,840 Hz
Viewing angle140° / 140°160° / 160°
Pixels per cabinet192 × 192192 × 192
Pixels per m²147,456147,456
Weight8.02 kg (32 kg/m²)8.9 kg (36 kg/m²)
Max power210 W (840 W/m²)210 W (840 W/m²)
Typical power105 W70 W
Max hang20 panelsnot published

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

ROE Visual RB2.6FSiliconCore Peony 2.6
Wall built16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m
Panels needed144 + 8 spare144 + 8 spare
Resolution3,072 × 1,728 px3,072 × 1,728 px
Weight incl. bumpers1,236 kg1,482 kg
Load per point~494 kg across 3~593 kg across 3
Power, full white30.2 kW30.2 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)1616
Data runs16 at ≤14/port16 at ≤14/port
Truck, linear6 m6 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 4.50 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons