ROE Visual GP2.6 vs SiliconCore Peony 2.6

2.604 mm against 2.604 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

	ROE Visual GP2.6	SiliconCore Peony 2.6
Manufacturer	ROE Visual	SiliconCore
Pixel pitch	2.604 mm	2.604 mm
Cabinet	500 × 1000 mm	500 × 500 mm
Brightness	1,500 nits	1,700 nits
Refresh rate	7,680 Hz	3,840 Hz
Viewing angle	160° / 140°	160° / 160°
Pixels per cabinet	192 × 384	192 × 192
Pixels per m²	147,456	147,456
Weight	9 kg (18 kg/m²)	8.9 kg (36 kg/m²)
Max power	320 W (640 W/m²)	210 W (840 W/m²)
Typical power	160 W	70 W
Max hang	12 panels	not published

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

	ROE Visual GP2.6	SiliconCore Peony 2.6
Wall built	16 × 5, 8.00 × 5.00 m	16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m
Panels needed	80 + 4 spare	144 + 8 spare
Resolution	3,072 × 1,920 px	3,072 × 1,728 px
Weight incl. bumpers	920 kg	1,482 kg
Load per point	~368 kg across 3	~593 kg across 3
Power, full white	25.6 kW	30.2 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)	10	16
Data runs	16 at ≤7/port	16 at ≤14/port
Truck, linear	4.6 m	6 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 5.00 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Both resolve to about the same density (147,456 and 147,456 pixels per square metre), so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
ROE Visual GP2.6 is the lighter rig: 18 kg/m² against 36 kg/m². Across this wall that is 562 kg of difference, 920 kg versus 1,482 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
SiliconCore Peony 2.6 draws more: 840 W/m² against 640 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 25.6 kW versus 30.2 kW, and 10 versus 16 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
Both come out at 16 data runs for this wall, though they carry 7 and 14 panels per port respectively.
Different cabinet formats: 500 × 1000 mm against 500 × 500 mm, so 80 tiles versus 144 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
Estimated truck space: 4.6 m for ROE Visual GP2.6 against 6 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

ROE Visual GP2.6 vs SiliconCore Peony 2.6

Specifications

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

What the numbers say

Full specifications

Related comparisons