RigPlan

Desay X2.6i vs ROE Visual RB2.6F

2.604 mm against 2.604 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

Desay X2.6iROE Visual RB2.6F
ManufacturerDesayROE Visual
Pixel pitch2.604 mm2.604 mm
Cabinet500 × 500 mm500 × 500 mm
Brightness1,500 nits2,500 nits
Refresh rate3,840 Hz7,680 Hz
Viewing angle160° / 140°140° / 140°
Pixels per cabinet192 × 192192 × 192
Pixels per m²147,456147,456
Weight10 kg (40 kg/m²)8.02 kg (32 kg/m²)
Max power165 W (660 W/m²)210 W (840 W/m²)
Typical power58 W105 W
Max hangnot published20 panels

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

Desay X2.6iROE Visual RB2.6F
Wall built16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m
Panels needed144 + 8 spare144 + 8 spare
Resolution3,072 × 1,728 px3,072 × 1,728 px
Weight incl. bumpers1,640 kg1,236 kg
Load per point~656 kg across 3~494 kg across 3
Power, full white23.8 kW30.2 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)916
Data runs16 at ≤14/port16 at ≤14/port
Truck, linear6 m6 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 4.50 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons