Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.
| Nanolumens Performance 500 5.9 | PixelFLEX FLEXStorm Pro 6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Nanolumens | PixelFLEX |
| Pixel pitch | 5.952 mm | 6 mm |
| Cabinet | 500 × 500 mm | 960 × 960 mm |
| Brightness | 5,500 nits | 8,500 nits |
| Refresh rate | not published | 3,840 Hz |
| Viewing angle | 140° / 140° | 160° / 90° |
| Pixels per cabinet | 84 × 84 | 160 × 160 |
| Pixels per m² | 28,224 | 27,778 |
| Weight | 9.34 kg (37 kg/m²) | 28 kg (30 kg/m²) |
| Max power | 165 W (660 W/m²) | 581 W (630 W/m²) |
| Typical power | 50 W | 194 W* |
| Max hang | not published | not published |
* Average draw estimated as max ÷ 3; this manufacturer publishes no average figure.
| Nanolumens Performance 500 5.9 | PixelFLEX FLEXStorm Pro 6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Wall built | 16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m | 8 × 5, 7.68 × 4.80 m |
| Panels needed | 144 + 8 spare | 40 + 2 spare |
| Resolution | 1,344 × 756 px | 1,280 × 800 px |
| Weight incl. bumpers | 1,545 kg | 1,220 kg |
| Load per point | ~618 kg across 3 | ~488 kg across 3 |
| Power, full white | 23.8 kW | 23.2 kW |
| Circuits (16 A/230 V) | 9 | 8 |
| Data runs | 2 at ≤73/port | 2 at ≤20/port |
| Truck, linear | 5.8 m | 3.3 m |
Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 4.50 m and 7.68 × 4.80 m respectively.
Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.
Open these two in the tool