3 matched panels · 1.8 to 1.9 mm · specifications from both makers' datasheets
The two lineups side by side, then what the matched panels say about weight, power and what each maker publishes. Every figure is the maker's own; the planner adds nothing it cannot point to on a sheet.
Sharp
Unilumin
Panels listed
17
23
Pitch range
0.9 to 7.8 mm
0.95 to 16.67 mm
Cabinet formats
600×337.5, 608×342, 500×500 mm
304.96×343.08, 609.92×343.08, 500×500, 1200×1200 mm
Weight
21 to 42 kg/m²
24 to 49 kg/m²
Maximum draw
168 to 720 W/m²
382 to 956 W/m²
Brightness
600 to 5,500 nits
600 to 8,000 nits
Hang limit published
0 of 17
10 of 23
Typical draw published
17 of 17
23 of 23
Weight and draw are per square metre of cabinet, so different cabinet sizes compare fairly. Ranges run across every panel the maker has in the database, not only the matched ones.
What the sheets say
Sharp and Unilumin overlap on 3 matched pairs between 1.8 and 1.9 mm; outside that band one of them has no comparable panel.
Sharp is the lighter cabinet in 1 of 3 matched pairs, Unilumin in 2. Across their lineups that is 21 to 42 kg/m² against 24 to 49 kg/m².
Sharp draws less at full white in 3 of 3 matched pairs, Unilumin in 0. Lineups: 168 to 720 W/m² against 382 to 956 W/m², which sets the circuit count.
Cabinet formats: Sharp builds in 600×337.5, 608×342, 500×500 mm; Unilumin in 304.96×343.08, 609.92×343.08, 500×500, 1200×1200 mm. A shop that already owns one format keeps its bumpers and cases.
A hanging limit is published for none of its 17 panels by Sharp and for 10 of its 23 panels by Unilumin; where it is not, the planner uses a conservative placeholder and says so.
Both publish a typical draw for every panel here, so the typical kilowatt figure rests on the sheets, not on an estimate.
Matched panels, side by side
Each pair is two panels of comparable pitch, one from each maker, with the same wall built from both.