Glux vs Nanolumens
6 matched panels · 1.5625 to 10.4 mm · specifications from both makers' datasheets
The two lineups side by side, then what the matched panels say about weight, power and what each maker publishes. Every figure is the maker's own; the planner adds nothing it cannot point to on a sheet.
| Glux | Nanolumens |
|---|
| Panels listed | 8 | 41 |
| Pitch range | 1.563 to 15.6 mm | 0.625 to 10.417 mm |
| Cabinet formats | 250×250, 500×500, 1000×500 mm | 240×150, 304.8×152.4, 300×168.8, 600×337.5, 500×500, 1200×675 mm |
| Weight | 10 to 34 kg/m² | 25 to 51 kg/m² |
| Maximum draw | 600 to 1,200 W/m² | 383 to 808 W/m² |
| Brightness | 700 to 6,000 nits | 700 to 6,500 nits |
| Hang limit published | 0 of 8 | 0 of 41 |
| Typical draw published | 8 of 8 | 41 of 41 |
Weight and draw are per square metre of cabinet, so different cabinet sizes compare fairly. Ranges run across every panel the maker has in the database, not only the matched ones.
What the sheets say
- Glux and Nanolumens overlap on 6 matched pairs between 1.5625 and 10.4 mm; outside that band one of them has no comparable panel.
- Glux is the lighter cabinet in 2 of 6 matched pairs, Nanolumens in 4. Across their lineups that is 10 to 34 kg/m² against 25 to 51 kg/m².
- Glux draws less at full white in 1 of 6 matched pairs, Nanolumens in 5. Lineups: 600 to 1,200 W/m² against 383 to 808 W/m², which sets the circuit count.
- Cabinet formats: Glux builds in 250×250, 500×500, 1000×500 mm; Nanolumens in 240×150, 304.8×152.4, 300×168.8, 600×337.5, 500×500, 1200×675 mm. A shop that already owns one format keeps its bumpers and cases.
- A hanging limit is published for none of its 8 panels by Glux and for none of its 41 panels by Nanolumens; where it is not, the planner uses a conservative placeholder and says so.
- Both publish a typical draw for every panel here, so the typical kilowatt figure rests on the sheets, not on an estimate.
Matched panels, side by side
Each pair is two panels of comparable pitch, one from each maker, with the same wall built from both.
More