Glux TVsn15 vs Nanolumens Nixel 1.56 Flex

1.5625 mm against 1.5625 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

	Glux TVsn15	Nanolumens Nixel 1.56 Flex
Manufacturer	Glux	Nanolumens
Pixel pitch	1.5625 mm	1.5625 mm
Cabinet	250 × 250 mm	300 × 168.8 mm
Brightness	700 nits	750 nits
Refresh rate	3,600 Hz	not published
Viewing angle	140° / 140°	160° / 160°
Pixels per cabinet	160 × 160	192 × 108
Pixels per m²	409,600	409,479
Weight	2.1 kg (34 kg/m²)	1.26 kg (25 kg/m²)
Max power	75 W (1200 W/m²)	37 W (731 W/m²)
Typical power	36 W	11.1 W
Max hang	not published	not published

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

	Glux TVsn15	Nanolumens Nixel 1.56 Flex
Wall built	32 × 18, 8.00 × 4.50 m	27 × 30, 8.10 × 5.06 m
Panels needed	576 + 29 spare	810 + 41 spare
Resolution	5,120 × 2,880 px	5,184 × 3,240 px
Weight incl. bumpers	1,610 kg	1,361 kg
Load per point	~644 kg across 3	~544 kg across 3
Power, full white	43.2 kW	30 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)	16	14
Data runs	32 at ≤20/port	54 at ≤25/port
Truck, linear	15.2 m	30.6 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 4.50 m and 8.10 × 5.06 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Both resolve to about the same density (409,600 and 409,479 pixels per square metre), so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
Nanolumens Nixel 1.56 Flex is the lighter rig: 25 kg/m² against 34 kg/m². Across this wall that is 249 kg of difference, 1,361 kg versus 1,610 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
Glux TVsn15 draws more: 1200 W/m² against 731 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 43.2 kW versus 30 kW, and 16 versus 14 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
Data is lighter on Glux TVsn15: 32 runs against 54, at 20 and 25 panels per port respectively (60 Hz, 8-bit, ports loaded to 80%). Fewer runs means fewer home runs to pull and fewer processor ports to find.
Different cabinet formats: 250 × 250 mm against 300 × 168.8 mm, so 576 tiles versus 810 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
Estimated truck space: 15.2 m for Glux TVsn15 against 30.6 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Glux TVsn15 vs Nanolumens Nixel 1.56 Flex

Specifications

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

What the numbers say

Full specifications

Related comparisons