RigPlan.app

Blizzard IRiS InSignia 2.6 vs ROE Visual RB2.6F

2.604 mm against 2.604 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

Blizzard IRiS InSignia 2.6ROE Visual RB2.6F
ManufacturerBlizzard IRiSROE Visual
Pixel pitch2.604 mm2.604 mm
Cabinet500 × 500 mm500 × 500 mm
Brightness800 nits2,500 nits
Refresh rate3,840 Hz7,680 Hz
Viewing anglenot published140° / 140°
Pixels per cabinet192 × 192192 × 192
Pixels per m²147,456147,456
Weight5.8 kg (23 kg/m²)8.02 kg (32 kg/m²)
Max power150 W (600 W/m²)210 W (840 W/m²)
Typical power50 W*105 W
Max hangnot published20 panels

* Average draw estimated as max ÷ 3; this manufacturer publishes no average figure.

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

Blizzard IRiS InSignia 2.6ROE Visual RB2.6F
Wall built16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m
Panels needed144 + 8 spare144 + 8 spare
Resolution3,072 × 1,728 px3,072 × 1,728 px
Weight incl. bumpers1,035 kg1,236 kg
Load per point~414 kg across 3~494 kg across 3
Power, full white21.6 kW30.2 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)816
Data runs16 at ≤14/port16 at ≤14/port
Truck, linear6 m6 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 4.50 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons