Desay X3.1 vs Nanolumens Performance 250 3.1

3.125 mm against 3.125 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

This page puts the two sheets side by side, then builds the same wall from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs.

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 4.50 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

• Both resolve to about the same density (102,400 and 102,400 pixels per square metre), so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
• Nanolumens Performance 250 3.1 is the lighter rig: 37 kg/m² against 42 kg/m². Across this wall that is 30 kg of difference, 1,712 kg versus 1,742 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
• Desay X3.1 draws more: 760 W/m² against 661 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 27.4 kW versus 23.8 kW, and 16 versus 11 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
• Both come out at 8 data runs for this wall, though they carry 20 and 81 panels per port respectively.
• Different cabinet formats: 500 × 500 mm against 250 × 250 mm, so 144 tiles versus 576 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
• Estimated truck space: 5.8 m for Desay X3.1 against 21.3 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Full specifications

• Desay X3.1: specs and calculator
• Nanolumens Performance 250 3.1: specs and calculator
• All Desay panels
• All Nanolumens panels

Related comparisons

• Desay X3.1 vs Nanolumens Performance 500 3.1
• Desay X3.1 vs Blizzard IRiS InSignia Panorama 3.1
• Dahua DHI-PHSIA3-SC vs Desay X3.1
• Blizzard IRiS InSignia Panorama 3.1 vs Nanolumens Performance 250 3.1
• Dahua DHI-PHSIA3-SC vs Nanolumens Performance 250 3.1