Dahua DHI-PHSIA3-SC vs Nanolumens Performance 250 3.1

3.077 mm against 3.125 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

This page puts the two sheets side by side, then builds the same wall from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs.

Specifications

	Dahua DHI-PHSIA3-SC	Nanolumens Performance 250 3.1
Manufacturer	Dahua	Nanolumens
Pixel pitch	3.077 mm	3.125 mm
Cabinet	640 × 480 mm	250 × 250 mm
Brightness	600 nits	6,000 nits
Refresh rate	3,840 Hz	not published
Viewing angle	140° / 140°	140° / 140°
Pixels per cabinet	208 × 156	80 × 80
Pixels per m²	105,625	102,400
Weight	6.5 kg (21 kg/m²)	2.33 kg (37 kg/m²)
Max power	123 W (400 W/m²)	41.3 W (661 W/m²)
Typical power	41 W	12.4 W
Max hang	not published	not published

The same wall, built from each closest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

	Dahua DHI-PHSIA3-SC	Nanolumens Performance 250 3.1
Wall built	12 × 9, 7.68 × 4.32 m	32 × 18, 8.00 × 4.50 m
Panels needed	108 + 6 spare	576 + 29 spare
Resolution	2,496 × 1,404 px	2,560 × 1,440 px
Weight incl. bumpers	852 kg	1,742 kg
Load per point	~341 kg across 3	~697 kg across 3
Power, full white	13.3 kW	23.8 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)	6	11
Data runs	12 at ≤16/port	8 at ≤81/port
Truck, linear	5.8 m	21.3 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 7.68 × 4.32 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Dahua DHI-PHSIA3-SC resolves finer: 105,625 pixels per square metre against 102,400 for Nanolumens Performance 250 3.1, 3% more. On a 8 m wide wall that is 2,496 px across versus 2,560 px.
Dahua DHI-PHSIA3-SC is the lighter rig: 21 kg/m² against 37 kg/m². Across this wall that is 890 kg of difference, 852 kg versus 1,742 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
Nanolumens Performance 250 3.1 draws more: 661 W/m² against 400 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 13.3 kW versus 23.8 kW, and 6 versus 11 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
Data is lighter on Nanolumens Performance 250 3.1: 8 runs against 12, at 16 and 81 panels per port respectively (60 Hz, 8-bit, ports loaded to 80%). Fewer runs means fewer home runs to pull and fewer processor ports to find.
Different cabinet formats: 640 × 480 mm against 250 × 250 mm, so 108 tiles versus 576 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
Estimated truck space: 5.8 m for Dahua DHI-PHSIA3-SC against 21.3 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

For other panels, or your own OEM tile, the comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Dahua DHI-PHSIA3-SC vs Nanolumens Performance 250 3.1

Specifications

The same wall, built from each closest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

What the numbers say

Full specifications

Related comparisons