Desay X3.1 vs Blizzard IRiS InSignia Panorama 3.1

3.125 mm against 3.125 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

	Desay X3.1	Blizzard IRiS InSignia Panorama 3.1
Manufacturer	Desay	Blizzard IRiS
Pixel pitch	3.125 mm	3.125 mm
Cabinet	500 × 500 mm	1200 × 300 mm
Brightness	3,000 nits	1,000 nits
Refresh rate	3,840 Hz	3,840 Hz
Viewing angle	160° / 100°	not published
Pixels per cabinet	160 × 160	384 × 96
Pixels per m²	102,400	102,400
Weight	10.5 kg (42 kg/m²)	10 kg (28 kg/m²)
Max power	190 W (760 W/m²)	180 W (500 W/m²)
Typical power	67 W	60 W*
Max hang	not published	not published

* Average draw estimated as max ÷ 3; this manufacturer publishes no average figure.

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

	Desay X3.1	Blizzard IRiS InSignia Panorama 3.1
Wall built	16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m	6 × 15, 7.20 × 4.50 m
Panels needed	144 + 8 spare	90 + 5 spare
Resolution	2,560 × 1,440 px	2,304 × 1,440 px
Weight incl. bumpers	1,712 kg	975 kg
Load per point	~685 kg across 3	~390 kg across 3
Power, full white	27.4 kW	16.2 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)	16	6
Data runs	8 at ≤20/port	12 at ≤14/port
Truck, linear	5.8 m	6.7 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 4.50 m and 7.20 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Both resolve to about the same density (102,400 and 102,400 pixels per square metre), so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
Blizzard IRiS InSignia Panorama 3.1 is the lighter rig: 28 kg/m² against 42 kg/m². Across this wall that is 737 kg of difference, 975 kg versus 1,712 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
Desay X3.1 draws more: 760 W/m² against 500 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 27.4 kW versus 16.2 kW, and 16 versus 6 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
Data is lighter on Desay X3.1: 8 runs against 12, at 20 and 14 panels per port respectively (60 Hz, 8-bit, ports loaded to 80%). Fewer runs means fewer home runs to pull and fewer processor ports to find.
Different cabinet formats: 500 × 500 mm against 1200 × 300 mm, so 144 tiles versus 90 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
Estimated truck space: 5.8 m for Desay X3.1 against 6.7 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Desay X3.1 vs Blizzard IRiS InSignia Panorama 3.1

Specifications

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

What the numbers say

Full specifications

Related comparisons