RigPlan.app

Blizzard IRiS InSignia Panorama 3.1 vs Nanolumens Performance 500 3.1

3.125 mm against 3.125 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

Blizzard IRiS InSignia Panorama 3.1Nanolumens Performance 500 3.1
ManufacturerBlizzard IRiSNanolumens
Pixel pitch3.125 mm3.125 mm
Cabinet1200 × 300 mm500 × 500 mm
Brightness1,000 nits6,000 nits
Refresh rate3,840 Hznot published
Viewing anglenot published140° / 140°
Pixels per cabinet384 × 96160 × 160
Pixels per m²102,400102,400
Weight10 kg (28 kg/m²)9.34 kg (37 kg/m²)
Max power180 W (500 W/m²)165 W (660 W/m²)
Typical power60 W*50 W
Max hangnot publishednot published

* Average draw estimated as max ÷ 3; this manufacturer publishes no average figure.

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

Blizzard IRiS InSignia Panorama 3.1Nanolumens Performance 500 3.1
Wall built6 × 15, 7.20 × 4.50 m16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m
Panels needed90 + 5 spare144 + 8 spare
Resolution2,304 × 1,440 px2,560 × 1,440 px
Weight incl. bumpers975 kg1,545 kg
Load per point~390 kg across 3~618 kg across 3
Power, full white16.2 kW23.8 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)69
Data runs12 at ≤14/port8 at ≤20/port
Truck, linear6.7 m5.8 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 7.20 × 4.50 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons