SiliconCore Camellia 0.95 vs Unilumin UpanelS 0.9

0.95 mm against 0.95 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 7.90 × 4.45 m and 7.93 × 4.46 m respectively.

What the numbers say

• Both resolve to about the same density (1,108,033 and 1,101,068 pixels per square metre), so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
• Unilumin UpanelS 0.9 is the lighter rig: 36 kg/m² against 46 kg/m². Across this wall that is 338 kg of difference, 1,433 kg versus 1,771 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
• Power is close: 736 W/m² for SiliconCore Camellia 0.95 against 717 W/m² for Unilumin UpanelS 0.9 at full white, giving 13 and 13 circuits respectively for this wall.
• Both come out at 91 data runs for this wall, though they carry 2 and 2 panels per port respectively.
• Different cabinet formats: 608 × 342 mm against 609.92 × 343.08 mm, so 169 tiles versus 169 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.

Full specifications

• SiliconCore Camellia 0.95: specs and calculator
• Unilumin UpanelS 0.9: specs and calculator
• All SiliconCore panels
• All Unilumin panels

Related comparisons

• Barco TP0.9-I vs Unilumin UpanelS 0.9
• Barco TP0.9-Q vs Unilumin UpanelS 0.9
• SiliconCore Camellia 0.95 vs Unilumin UpanelS MP 0.9
• Barco TP0.9-I vs SiliconCore Camellia 0.95
• Barco TP0.9-Q vs SiliconCore Camellia 0.95
• Planar TVF009 vs Unilumin UpanelS 0.9