Barco TP0.9-I vs SiliconCore Camellia 0.95

0.953 mm against 0.95 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 7.93 × 4.46 m and 7.90 × 4.45 m respectively.

What the numbers say

• Both resolve to about the same density (1,101,068 and 1,108,033 pixels per square metre), so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
• Barco TP0.9-I is the lighter rig: 40 kg/m² against 46 kg/m². Across this wall that is 203 kg of difference, 1,568 kg versus 1,771 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
• SiliconCore Camellia 0.95 draws more: 736 W/m² against 698 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 24.7 kW versus 25.9 kW, and 13 versus 13 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
• Both come out at 91 data runs for this wall, though they carry 2 and 2 panels per port respectively.
• Different cabinet formats: 609.92 × 343.08 mm against 608 × 342 mm, so 169 tiles versus 169 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.

Full specifications

• Barco TP0.9-I: specs and calculator
• SiliconCore Camellia 0.95: specs and calculator
• All Barco panels
• All SiliconCore panels

Related comparisons

• SiliconCore Camellia 0.95 vs Unilumin UpanelS 0.9
• Barco TP0.9-I vs Unilumin UpanelS 0.9
• SiliconCore Camellia 0.95 vs Unilumin UpanelS MP 0.9
• Barco TP0.9-I vs Unilumin UpanelS MP 0.9
• Barco TP0.9-Q vs SiliconCore Camellia 0.95
• Barco TP0.9-I vs Christie MicroTiles 1.0 S80