Which is lighter, Samsung IF015H or Sharp LD-EC151?

Sharp LD-EC151 is the lighter rig: 21 kg/m² against 22 kg/m². Across this wall that is 50 kg of difference — 892 kg versus 942 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.

Which draws more power?

Samsung IF015H draws more: 772 W/m² against 252 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 25.6 kW versus 8.6 kW, and 16 versus 4 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.

Which resolves finer?

Samsung IF015H resolves finer: 444,444 pixels per square metre against 409,600 for Sharp LD-EC151, 9% more. On a 8 m wide wall that is 5,120 px across versus 4,992 px.

RigPlan

Wall in. Truck list out.

Samsung IF015H vs Sharp LD-EC151

1.5 mm against 1.5 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile — so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

	Samsung IF015H	Sharp LD-EC151
Manufacturer	Samsung	Sharp
Pixel pitch	1.5 mm	1.5 mm
Cabinet	480 × 540 mm	600 × 337.5 mm
Pixels per cabinet	320 × 360	384 × 216
Pixels per m²	444,444	409,600
Weight	5.8 kg (22 kg/m²)	4.3 kg (21 kg/m²)
Max power	200 W (772 W/m²)	51 W (252 W/m²)
Typical power	67 W	27 W
Max hang	not published	not published

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

	Samsung IF015H	Sharp LD-EC151
Wall built	16 × 8 — 7.68 × 4.32 m	13 × 13 — 7.80 × 4.39 m
Panels needed	128 + 7 spare	169 + 9 spare
Resolution	5,120 × 2,880 px	4,992 × 2,808 px
Weight incl. bumpers	942 kg	892 kg
Load per point	~377 kg across 3	~357 kg across 3
Power, full white	25.6 kW	8.6 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)	16	4
Data runs	32 at ≤4/port	39 at ≤6/port
Truck, linear	6 m	7.5 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile — 7.68 × 4.32 m and 7.80 × 4.39 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Samsung IF015H resolves finer: 444,444 pixels per square metre against 409,600 for Sharp LD-EC151, 9% more. On a 8 m wide wall that is 5,120 px across versus 4,992 px.
Sharp LD-EC151 is the lighter rig: 21 kg/m² against 22 kg/m². Across this wall that is 50 kg of difference — 892 kg versus 942 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
Samsung IF015H draws more: 772 W/m² against 252 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 25.6 kW versus 8.6 kW, and 16 versus 4 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
Data is lighter on Samsung IF015H: 32 runs against 39, at 4 and 6 panels per port respectively (60 Hz, 8-bit, ports loaded to 80%). Fewer runs means fewer home runs to pull and fewer processor ports to find.
Different cabinet formats: 480 × 540 mm against 600 × 337.5 mm, so 128 tiles versus 169 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
Estimated truck space: 6 m for Samsung IF015H against 7.5 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Comparing something else — or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Samsung IF015H vs Sharp LD-EC151

Specifications

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

What the numbers say

Full specifications

Related comparisons