Barco XT1.5-E vs Sharp LD-EC151

1.5 mm against 1.5 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

This page puts the two sheets side by side, then builds the same wall from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs.

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 7.93 × 4.46 m and 7.80 × 4.39 m respectively.

What the numbers say

• Sharp LD-EC151 resolves finer: 409,600 pixels per square metre against 396,385 for Barco XT1.5-E, 3% more. On a 8 m wide wall that is 4,992 px across versus 4,992 px.
• Sharp LD-EC151 is the lighter rig: 21 kg/m² against 36 kg/m². Across this wall that is 541 kg of difference, 892 kg versus 1,433 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
• Barco XT1.5-E draws more: 650 W/m² against 252 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 23 kW versus 8.6 kW, and 13 versus 4 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
• Both come out at 39 data runs for this wall, though they carry 6 and 6 panels per port respectively.
• Different cabinet formats: 609.92 × 343.08 mm against 600 × 337.5 mm, so 169 tiles versus 169 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.

Full specifications

• Barco XT1.5-E: specs and calculator
• Sharp LD-EC151: specs and calculator
• All Barco panels
• All Sharp panels

Related comparisons

• Samsung IF015H vs Sharp LD-EC151
• Barco XT1.5-E vs Sharp LD-FE153
• Barco XT1.5-E vs Sharp LD-D151
• Leyard CLI1.5 vs Sharp LD-EC151
• Barco XT1.5-E vs Samsung IF015H