RigPlan.app

Planar CarbonLight CLI1.9L vs ROE Visual Ruby RB1.9F

1.95 mm against 1.95 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

This page puts the two sheets side by side, then builds the same wall from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs.

Specifications

Planar CarbonLight CLI1.9LROE Visual Ruby RB1.9F
ManufacturerPlanarROE Visual
Pixel pitch1.95 mm1.95 mm
Cabinet500 × 1000 mm500 × 500 mm
Brightness1,000 nits1,100 nits
Refresh rate7,680 Hz7,680 Hz
Viewing angle140° / 140°140° / 140°
Pixels per cabinet256 × 512256 × 256
Pixels per m²262,144262,144
Weight7 kg (14 kg/m²)8.6 kg (34 kg/m²)
Max power400 W (800 W/m²)240 W (960 W/m²)
Typical power135 W120 W
Max hangnot published20 panels

The same wall, built from each closest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

Planar CarbonLight CLI1.9LROE Visual Ruby RB1.9F
Wall built16 × 5, 8.00 × 5.00 m16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m
Panels needed80 + 4 spare144 + 8 spare
Resolution4,096 × 2,560 px4,096 × 2,304 px
Weight incl. bumpers760 kg1,319 kg
Load per point~304 kg across 3~528 kg across 3
Power, full white32 kW34.6 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)1516
Data runs32 at ≤3/port32 at ≤7/port
Truck, linear5 m6.5 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 5.00 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

For other panels, or your own OEM tile, the comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons