RigPlan
Wall in. Truck list out.

Planar CLI1.9L vs ROE Visual RB1.9B

1.95 mm against 1.95 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile — so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

Planar CLI1.9LROE Visual RB1.9B
ManufacturerPlanarROE Visual
Pixel pitch1.95 mm1.95 mm
Cabinet500 × 1000 mm500 × 500 mm
Pixels per cabinet256 × 512256 × 256
Pixels per m²262,144262,144
Weight7 kg (14 kg/m²)8.8 kg (35 kg/m²)
Max power400 W (800 W/m²)160 W (640 W/m²)
Typical power135 W80 W
Max hangnot published20 panels

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

Planar CLI1.9LROE Visual RB1.9B
Wall built16 × 5 — 8.00 × 5.00 m16 × 9 — 8.00 × 4.50 m
Panels needed80 + 4 spare144 + 8 spare
Resolution4,096 × 2,560 px4,096 × 2,304 px
Weight incl. bumpers760 kg1,467 kg
Load per point~304 kg across 3~587 kg across 3
Power, full white32 kW23 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)158
Data runs32 at ≤3/port32 at ≤7/port
Truck, linear5 m6.5 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile — 8.00 × 5.00 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else — or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons