RigPlan
Wall in. Truck list out.

Planar CLI VX2.6 vs ROE Visual DM2.6

2.6 mm against 2.6 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile — so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

Planar CLI VX2.6ROE Visual DM2.6
ManufacturerPlanarROE Visual
Pixel pitch2.6 mm2.6 mm
Cabinet500 × 500 mm500 × 500 mm
Pixels per cabinet192 × 192192 × 192
Pixels per m²147,456147,456
Weight4.3 kg (17 kg/m²)5.76 kg (23 kg/m²)
Max power225 W (900 W/m²)180 W (720 W/m²)
Typical power75 W*90 W
Max hangnot published20 panels

* Average draw estimated as max ÷ 3 — this manufacturer publishes no average figure.

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

Planar CLI VX2.6ROE Visual DM2.6
Wall built16 × 9 — 8.00 × 4.50 m16 × 9 — 8.00 × 4.50 m
Panels needed144 + 8 spare144 + 8 spare
Resolution3,072 × 1,728 px3,072 × 1,728 px
Weight incl. bumpers819 kg1,029 kg
Load per point~328 kg across 3~412 kg across 3
Power, full white32.4 kW25.9 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)169
Data runs16 at ≤14/port16 at ≤14/port
Truck, linear6 m6 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile — 8.00 × 4.50 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else — or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons