RigPlan.app

Nanolumens Performance 500 10.4 vs PixelFLEX FLEXStorm Pro 10

10.417 mm against 10 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

Nanolumens Performance 500 10.4PixelFLEX FLEXStorm Pro 10
ManufacturerNanolumensPixelFLEX
Pixel pitch10.417 mm10 mm
Cabinet500 × 500 mm960 × 960 mm
Brightness5,500 nits10,000 nits
Refresh ratenot published3,840 Hz
Viewing angle140° / 140°160° / 90°
Pixels per cabinet48 × 4896 × 96
Pixels per m²9,21610,000
Weight9.34 kg (37 kg/m²)28 kg (30 kg/m²)
Max power165 W (660 W/m²)553 W (600 W/m²)
Typical power50 W184 W*
Max hangnot publishednot published

* Average draw estimated as max ÷ 3; this manufacturer publishes no average figure.

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

Nanolumens Performance 500 10.4PixelFLEX FLEXStorm Pro 10
Wall built16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m8 × 5, 7.68 × 4.80 m
Panels needed144 + 8 spare40 + 2 spare
Resolution768 × 432 px768 × 480 px
Weight incl. bumpers1,545 kg1,220 kg
Load per point~618 kg across 3~488 kg across 3
Power, full white23.8 kW22.1 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)98
Data runs1 at ≤225/port1 at ≤56/port
Truck, linear5.8 m3.3 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 4.50 m and 7.68 × 4.80 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons