RigPlan.app

Nanolumens Nixel 9 Rigid vs PixelFLEX FLEXStorm Pro 10

9.525 mm against 10 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

Nanolumens Nixel 9 RigidPixelFLEX FLEXStorm Pro 10
ManufacturerNanolumensPixelFLEX
Pixel pitch9.525 mm10 mm
Cabinet304.8 × 152.4 mm960 × 960 mm
Brightness1,800 nits10,000 nits
Refresh ratenot published3,840 Hz
Viewing angle170° / 160°160° / 90°
Pixels per cabinet32 × 1696 × 96
Pixels per m²11,02210,000
Weight1.23 kg (26 kg/m²)28 kg (30 kg/m²)
Max power20.9 W (450 W/m²)553 W (600 W/m²)
Typical power6.3 W184 W*
Max hangnot publishednot published

* Average draw estimated as max ÷ 3; this manufacturer publishes no average figure.

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

Nanolumens Nixel 9 RigidPixelFLEX FLEXStorm Pro 10
Wall built25 × 28, 7.62 × 4.27 m8 × 5, 7.68 × 4.80 m
Panels needed700 + 35 spare40 + 2 spare
Resolution800 × 448 px768 × 480 px
Weight incl. bumpers1,176 kg1,220 kg
Load per point~470 kg across 3~488 kg across 3
Power, full white14.6 kW22.1 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)58
Data runs1 at ≤1015/port1 at ≤56/port
Truck, linear25.4 m3.3 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 7.62 × 4.27 m and 7.68 × 4.80 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons