Nanolumens Nixel 6 Rigid vs Unilumin Usurface III 6.67 (1200×1200)

6.35 mm against 6.67 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

	Nanolumens Nixel 6 Rigid	Unilumin Usurface III 6.67 (1200×1200)
Manufacturer	Nanolumens	Unilumin
Pixel pitch	6.35 mm	6.67 mm
Cabinet	304.8 × 152.4 mm	1200 × 1200 mm
Brightness	1,350 nits	6,500 nits
Refresh rate	not published	3,840 Hz
Viewing angle	160° / 160°	140° / 120°
Pixels per cabinet	48 × 24	180 × 180
Pixels per m²	24,800	22,500
Weight	1.23 kg (26 kg/m²)	49.4 kg (34 kg/m²)
Max power	23.5 W (506 W/m²)	936 W (650 W/m²)
Typical power	7.1 W	312 W
Max hang	not published	not published

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

	Nanolumens Nixel 6 Rigid	Unilumin Usurface III 6.67 (1200×1200)
Wall built	25 × 28, 7.62 × 4.27 m	8 × 5, 9.60 × 6.00 m
Panels needed	700 + 35 spare	40 + 2 spare
Resolution	1,200 × 672 px	1,440 × 900 px
Weight incl. bumpers	1,176 kg	2,076 kg
Load per point	~470 kg across 3	~623 kg across 4
Power, full white	16.5 kW	37.4 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)	7	15
Data runs	2 at ≤451/port	3 at ≤16/port
Truck, linear	25.4 m	5.4 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 7.62 × 4.27 m and 9.60 × 6.00 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Nanolumens Nixel 6 Rigid resolves finer: 24,800 pixels per square metre against 22,500 for Unilumin Usurface III 6.67 (1200×1200), 10% more. On a 8 m wide wall that is 1,200 px across versus 1,440 px.
Nanolumens Nixel 6 Rigid is the lighter rig: 26 kg/m² against 34 kg/m². Across this wall that is 900 kg of difference, 1,176 kg versus 2,076 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
Unilumin Usurface III 6.67 (1200×1200) draws more: 650 W/m² against 506 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 16.5 kW versus 37.4 kW, and 7 versus 15 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
Data is lighter on Nanolumens Nixel 6 Rigid: 2 runs against 3, at 451 and 16 panels per port respectively (60 Hz, 8-bit, ports loaded to 80%). Fewer runs means fewer home runs to pull and fewer processor ports to find.
Different cabinet formats: 304.8 × 152.4 mm against 1200 × 1200 mm, so 700 tiles versus 40 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
Estimated truck space: 5.4 m for Unilumin Usurface III 6.67 (1200×1200) against 25.4 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Nanolumens Nixel 6 Rigid vs Unilumin Usurface III 6.67 (1200×1200)

Specifications

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

What the numbers say

Full specifications

Related comparisons