Glux BAtn6 vs Unilumin Usurface III 6.67 (1200×1200)

6.9 mm against 6.67 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

	Glux BAtn6	Unilumin Usurface III 6.67 (1200×1200)
Manufacturer	Glux	Unilumin
Pixel pitch	6.9 mm	6.67 mm
Cabinet	1000 × 500 mm	1200 × 1200 mm
Brightness	5,000 nits	6,500 nits
Refresh rate	3,000 Hz	3,840 Hz
Viewing angle	140° / 140°	140° / 120°
Pixels per cabinet	144 × 72	180 × 180
Pixels per m²	20,736	22,500
Weight	4.8 kg (10 kg/m²)	49.4 kg (34 kg/m²)
Max power	300 W (600 W/m²)	936 W (650 W/m²)
Typical power	150 W	312 W
Max hang	not published	not published

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

	Glux BAtn6	Unilumin Usurface III 6.67 (1200×1200)
Wall built	8 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m	8 × 5, 9.60 × 6.00 m
Panels needed	72 + 4 spare	40 + 2 spare
Resolution	1,152 × 648 px	1,440 × 900 px
Weight incl. bumpers	446 kg	2,076 kg
Load per point	~178 kg across 3	~623 kg across 4
Power, full white	21.6 kW	37.4 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)	8	15
Data runs	2 at ≤50/port	3 at ≤16/port
Truck, linear	3.3 m	5.4 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 4.50 m and 9.60 × 6.00 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Unilumin Usurface III 6.67 (1200×1200) resolves finer: 22,500 pixels per square metre against 20,736 for Glux BAtn6, 9% more. On a 8 m wide wall that is 1,440 px across versus 1,152 px.
Glux BAtn6 is the lighter rig: 10 kg/m² against 34 kg/m². Across this wall that is 1,630 kg of difference, 446 kg versus 2,076 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
Unilumin Usurface III 6.67 (1200×1200) draws more: 650 W/m² against 600 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 21.6 kW versus 37.4 kW, and 8 versus 15 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
Data is lighter on Glux BAtn6: 2 runs against 3, at 50 and 16 panels per port respectively (60 Hz, 8-bit, ports loaded to 80%). Fewer runs means fewer home runs to pull and fewer processor ports to find.
Different cabinet formats: 1000 × 500 mm against 1200 × 1200 mm, so 72 tiles versus 40 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
Estimated truck space: 3.3 m for Glux BAtn6 against 5.4 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Glux BAtn6 vs Unilumin Usurface III 6.67 (1200×1200)

Specifications

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

What the numbers say

Full specifications

Related comparisons