3 matched panels · 1.5 to 1.5 mm · specifications from both makers' datasheets
The two lineups side by side, then what the matched panels say about weight, power and what each maker publishes. Every figure is the maker's own; the planner adds nothing it cannot point to on a sheet.
Samsung
Sharp
Panels listed
12
17
Pitch range
0.84 to 6 mm
0.9 to 7.8 mm
Cabinet formats
480×540, 480×720, 806.4×453.6, 1209.6×680.4 mm
600×337.5, 608×342, 500×500 mm
Weight
21 to 31 kg/m²
21 to 42 kg/m²
Maximum draw
321 to 772 W/m²
168 to 720 W/m²
Brightness
500 to 1,200 nits
600 to 5,500 nits
Hang limit published
0 of 12
0 of 17
Typical draw published
12 of 12
17 of 17
Weight and draw are per square metre of cabinet, so different cabinet sizes compare fairly. Ranges run across every panel the maker has in the database, not only the matched ones.
What the sheets say
Samsung and Sharp overlap on 3 matched pairs between 1.5 and 1.5 mm; outside that band one of them has no comparable panel.
Samsung is the lighter cabinet in 2 of 3 matched pairs, Sharp in 1. Across their lineups that is 21 to 31 kg/m² against 21 to 42 kg/m².
Samsung draws less at full white in 0 of 3 matched pairs, Sharp in 3. Lineups: 321 to 772 W/m² against 168 to 720 W/m², which sets the circuit count.
Cabinet formats: Samsung builds in 480×540, 480×720, 806.4×453.6, 1209.6×680.4 mm; Sharp in 600×337.5, 608×342, 500×500 mm. A shop that already owns one format keeps its bumpers and cases.
A hanging limit is published for none of its 12 panels by Samsung and for none of its 17 panels by Sharp; where it is not, the planner uses a conservative placeholder and says so.
Both publish a typical draw for every panel here, so the typical kilowatt figure rests on the sheets, not on an estimate.
Matched panels, side by side
Each pair is two panels of comparable pitch, one from each maker, with the same wall built from both.