4 matched panels · 0.78125 to 0.78125 mm · specifications from both makers' datasheets
The two lineups side by side, then what the matched panels say about weight, power and what each maker publishes. Every figure is the maker's own; the planner adds nothing it cannot point to on a sheet.
Philips (PPDS)
Samsung
Panels listed
20
12
Pitch range
0.781 to 1.9 mm
0.84 to 6 mm
Cabinet formats
600×337.5, 608×342 mm
480×540, 480×720, 806.4×453.6, 1209.6×680.4 mm
Weight
20 to 38 kg/m²
21 to 31 kg/m²
Maximum draw
267 to 808 W/m²
321 to 772 W/m²
Brightness
600 to 1,000 nits
500 to 1,200 nits
Hang limit published
0 of 20
0 of 12
Typical draw published
20 of 20
12 of 12
Weight and draw are per square metre of cabinet, so different cabinet sizes compare fairly. Ranges run across every panel the maker has in the database, not only the matched ones.
What the sheets say
Philips (PPDS) and Samsung overlap on 4 matched pairs between 0.78125 and 0.78125 mm; outside that band one of them has no comparable panel.
Philips (PPDS) is the lighter cabinet in 4 of 4 matched pairs, Samsung in 0. Across their lineups that is 20 to 38 kg/m² against 21 to 31 kg/m².
Philips (PPDS) draws less at full white in 1 of 4 matched pairs, Samsung in 1, and 2 are within 5%. Lineups: 267 to 808 W/m² against 321 to 772 W/m², which sets the circuit count.
Cabinet formats: Philips (PPDS) builds in 600×337.5, 608×342 mm; Samsung in 480×540, 480×720, 806.4×453.6, 1209.6×680.4 mm. A shop that already owns one format keeps its bumpers and cases.
A hanging limit is published for none of its 20 panels by Philips (PPDS) and for none of its 12 panels by Samsung; where it is not, the planner uses a conservative placeholder and says so.
Both publish a typical draw for every panel here, so the typical kilowatt figure rests on the sheets, not on an estimate.
Matched panels, side by side
Each pair is two panels of comparable pitch, one from each maker, with the same wall built from both.