7 matched panels · 0.78 to 1.25 mm · specifications from both makers' datasheets
The two lineups side by side, then what the matched panels say about weight, power and what each maker publishes. Every figure is the maker's own; the planner adds nothing it cannot point to on a sheet.
LG
Nanolumens
Panels listed
26
48
Pitch range
0.78 to 2.5 mm
0.625 to 10.417 mm
Cabinet formats
300×337.5, 600×337.5, 1200×675 mm
240×150, 304.8×152.4, 300×168.8, 250×250, 600×337.5, 500×500, 1200×675 mm
Weight
25 to 39 kg/m²
25 to 51 kg/m²
Maximum draw
346 to 741 W/m²
383 to 808 W/m²
Brightness
600 to 1,000 nits
700 to 6,500 nits
Hang limit published
0 of 26
0 of 48
Typical draw published
26 of 26
48 of 48
Weight and draw are per square metre of cabinet, so different cabinet sizes compare fairly. Ranges run across every panel the maker has in the database, not only the matched ones.
What the sheets say
LG and Nanolumens overlap on 7 matched pairs between 0.78 and 1.25 mm; outside that band one of them has no comparable panel.
LG is the lighter cabinet in 1 of 7 matched pairs, Nanolumens in 3, and 3 are within 5%. Across their lineups that is 25 to 39 kg/m² against 25 to 51 kg/m².
LG draws less at full white in 2 of 7 matched pairs, Nanolumens in 3, and 2 are within 5%. Lineups: 346 to 741 W/m² against 383 to 808 W/m², which sets the circuit count.
Cabinet formats: LG builds in 300×337.5, 600×337.5, 1200×675 mm; Nanolumens in 240×150, 304.8×152.4, 300×168.8, 250×250, 600×337.5, 500×500, 1200×675 mm. A shop that already owns one format keeps its bumpers and cases.
A hanging limit is published for none of its 26 panels by LG and for none of its 48 panels by Nanolumens; where it is not, the planner uses a conservative placeholder and says so.
Both publish a typical draw for every panel here, so the typical kilowatt figure rests on the sheets, not on an estimate.
Matched panels, side by side
Each pair is two panels of comparable pitch, one from each maker, with the same wall built from both.