LG LSCB012 vs Nanolumens Nixel 1.25 Flex

1.25 mm against 1.25 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

	LG LSCB012	Nanolumens Nixel 1.25 Flex
Manufacturer	LG	Nanolumens
Pixel pitch	1.25 mm	1.25 mm
Cabinet	600 × 337.5 mm	300 × 168.8 mm
Brightness	800 nits	770 nits
Refresh rate	3,840 Hz	not published
Viewing angle	160° / 160°	170° / 170°
Pixels per cabinet	480 × 270	240 × 135
Pixels per m²	640,000	639,810
Weight	5.3 kg (26 kg/m²)	1.26 kg (25 kg/m²)
Max power	150 W (741 W/m²)	37 W (731 W/m²)
Typical power	50 W	11.1 W
Max hang	not published	not published

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

	LG LSCB012	Nanolumens Nixel 1.25 Flex
Wall built	13 × 13, 7.80 × 4.39 m	27 × 30, 8.10 × 5.06 m
Panels needed	169 + 9 spare	810 + 41 spare
Resolution	6,240 × 3,510 px	6,480 × 4,050 px
Weight incl. bumpers	1,061 kg	1,361 kg
Load per point	~424 kg across 3	~544 kg across 3
Power, full white	25.4 kW	30 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)	13	14
Data runs	52 at ≤4/port	54 at ≤16/port
Truck, linear	8.1 m	30.6 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 7.80 × 4.39 m and 8.10 × 5.06 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Both resolve to about the same density (640,000 and 639,810 pixels per square metre), so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
Nanolumens Nixel 1.25 Flex is the lighter rig: 25 kg/m² against 26 kg/m². Across this wall that is 300 kg of difference, 1,061 kg versus 1,361 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
Power is close: 741 W/m² for LG LSCB012 against 731 W/m² for Nanolumens Nixel 1.25 Flex at full white, giving 13 and 14 circuits respectively for this wall.
Data is lighter on LG LSCB012: 52 runs against 54, at 4 and 16 panels per port respectively (60 Hz, 8-bit, ports loaded to 80%). Fewer runs means fewer home runs to pull and fewer processor ports to find.
Different cabinet formats: 600 × 337.5 mm against 300 × 168.8 mm, so 169 tiles versus 810 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
Estimated truck space: 8.1 m for LG LSCB012 against 30.6 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

LG LSCB012 vs Nanolumens Nixel 1.25 Flex

Specifications

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

What the numbers say

Full specifications

Related comparisons