Desay vs Philips (PPDS)
8 matched panels · 1.25 to 1.563 mm · specifications from both makers' datasheets
The two lineups side by side, then what the matched panels say about weight, power and what each maker publishes. Every figure is the maker's own; the planner adds nothing it cannot point to on a sheet.
| Desay | Philips (PPDS) |
|---|
| Panels listed | 18 | 20 |
| Pitch range | 1.25 to 16.667 mm | 0.781 to 1.9 mm |
| Cabinet formats | 500×500, 800×900 mm | 600×337.5, 608×342 mm |
| Weight | 22 to 44 kg/m² | 20 to 38 kg/m² |
| Maximum draw | 531 to 760 W/m² | 267 to 808 W/m² |
| Brightness | 600 to 5,000 nits | 600 to 1,000 nits |
| Hang limit published | 0 of 18 | 0 of 20 |
| Typical draw published | 18 of 18 | 20 of 20 |
Weight and draw are per square metre of cabinet, so different cabinet sizes compare fairly. Ranges run across every panel the maker has in the database, not only the matched ones.
What the sheets say
- Desay and Philips (PPDS) overlap on 8 matched pairs between 1.25 and 1.563 mm; outside that band one of them has no comparable panel.
- Desay is the lighter cabinet in 0 of 8 matched pairs, Philips (PPDS) in 8. Across their lineups that is 22 to 44 kg/m² against 20 to 38 kg/m².
- Desay draws less at full white in 0 of 8 matched pairs, Philips (PPDS) in 8. Lineups: 531 to 760 W/m² against 267 to 808 W/m², which sets the circuit count.
- Cabinet formats: Desay builds in 500×500, 800×900 mm; Philips (PPDS) in 600×337.5, 608×342 mm. A shop that already owns one format keeps its bumpers and cases.
- A hanging limit is published for none of its 18 panels by Desay and for none of its 20 panels by Philips (PPDS); where it is not, the planner uses a conservative placeholder and says so.
- Both publish a typical draw for every panel here, so the typical kilowatt figure rests on the sheets, not on an estimate.
Matched panels, side by side
Each pair is two panels of comparable pitch, one from each maker, with the same wall built from both.
More