Desay X1.5i vs Philips (PPDS) 27HDL5115IP

1.563 mm against 1.5625 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

	Desay X1.5i	Philips (PPDS) 27HDL5115IP
Manufacturer	Desay	Philips (PPDS)
Pixel pitch	1.563 mm	1.5625 mm
Cabinet	500 × 500 mm	600 × 337.5 mm
Brightness	600 nits	600 nits
Refresh rate	2,880 Hz	3,840 Hz
Viewing angle	160° / 140°	160° / 160°
Pixels per cabinet	320 × 320	384 × 216
Pixels per m²	409,600	409,600
Weight	10.9 kg (44 kg/m²)	4.7 kg (23 kg/m²)
Max power	180 W (720 W/m²)	81 W (400 W/m²)
Typical power	63 W	40 W
Max hang	not published	not published

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

	Desay X1.5i	Philips (PPDS) 27HDL5115IP
Wall built	16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m	13 × 13, 7.80 × 4.39 m
Panels needed	144 + 8 spare	169 + 9 spare
Resolution	5,120 × 2,880 px	4,992 × 2,808 px
Weight incl. bumpers	1,770 kg	959 kg
Load per point	~708 kg across 3	~384 kg across 3
Power, full white	25.9 kW	13.7 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)	9	7
Data runs	32 at ≤5/port	39 at ≤6/port
Truck, linear	6.5 m	7.5 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 4.50 m and 7.80 × 4.39 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Both resolve to about the same density (409,600 and 409,600 pixels per square metre), so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
Philips (PPDS) 27HDL5115IP is the lighter rig: 23 kg/m² against 44 kg/m². Across this wall that is 811 kg of difference, 959 kg versus 1,770 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
Desay X1.5i draws more: 720 W/m² against 400 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 25.9 kW versus 13.7 kW, and 9 versus 7 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
Data is lighter on Desay X1.5i: 32 runs against 39, at 5 and 6 panels per port respectively (60 Hz, 8-bit, ports loaded to 80%). Fewer runs means fewer home runs to pull and fewer processor ports to find.
Different cabinet formats: 500 × 500 mm against 600 × 337.5 mm, so 144 tiles versus 169 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
Estimated truck space: 6.5 m for Desay X1.5i against 7.5 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Desay X1.5i vs Philips (PPDS) 27HDL5115IP

Specifications

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

What the numbers say

Full specifications

Related comparisons