18 matched panels · 1.538 to 5.714 mm · specifications from both makers' datasheets
The two lineups side by side, then what the matched panels say about weight, power and what each maker publishes. Every figure is the maker's own; the planner adds nothing it cannot point to on a sheet.
Dahua
ROE Visual
Panels listed
57
19
Pitch range
0.938 to 10 mm
1.56 to 8.9 mm
Cabinet formats
600×337.5, 500×500, 640×480, 1000×500, 500×1000, 960×960 mm
500×500, 500×1000, 600×1200, 1000×1000 mm
Weight
19 to 36 kg/m²
9 to 37 kg/m²
Maximum draw
331 to 680 W/m²
420 to 960 W/m²
Brightness
500 to 6,500 nits
800 to 6,000 nits
Hang limit published
0 of 57
19 of 19
Typical draw published
57 of 57
19 of 19
Weight and draw are per square metre of cabinet, so different cabinet sizes compare fairly. Ranges run across every panel the maker has in the database, not only the matched ones.
What the sheets say
Dahua and ROE Visual overlap on 18 matched pairs between 1.538 and 5.714 mm; outside that band one of them has no comparable panel.
Dahua is the lighter cabinet in 10 of 18 matched pairs, ROE Visual in 8. Across their lineups that is 19 to 36 kg/m² against 9 to 37 kg/m².
Dahua draws less at full white in 16 of 18 matched pairs, ROE Visual in 1, and 1 is within 5%. Lineups: 331 to 680 W/m² against 420 to 960 W/m², which sets the circuit count.
Cabinet formats: Dahua builds in 600×337.5, 500×500, 640×480, 1000×500, 500×1000, 960×960 mm; ROE Visual in 500×500, 500×1000, 600×1200, 1000×1000 mm. A shop that already owns one format keeps its bumpers and cases.
A hanging limit is published for none of its 57 panels by Dahua and for every one of its 19 panels by ROE Visual; where it is not, the planner uses a conservative placeholder and says so.
Both publish a typical draw for every panel here, so the typical kilowatt figure rests on the sheets, not on an estimate.
Matched panels, side by side
Each pair is two panels of comparable pitch, one from each maker, with the same wall built from both.