12 matched panels · 3.077 to 3.906 mm · specifications from both makers' datasheets
The two lineups side by side, then what the matched panels say about weight, power and what each maker publishes. Every figure is the maker's own; the planner adds nothing it cannot point to on a sheet.
Dahua
Nanolumens
Panels listed
57
41
Pitch range
0.938 to 10 mm
0.625 to 10.417 mm
Cabinet formats
600×337.5, 500×500, 640×480, 1000×500, 500×1000, 960×960 mm
240×150, 304.8×152.4, 300×168.8, 600×337.5, 500×500, 1200×675 mm
Weight
19 to 36 kg/m²
25 to 51 kg/m²
Maximum draw
331 to 680 W/m²
383 to 808 W/m²
Brightness
500 to 6,500 nits
700 to 6,500 nits
Hang limit published
0 of 57
0 of 41
Typical draw published
57 of 57
41 of 41
Weight and draw are per square metre of cabinet, so different cabinet sizes compare fairly. Ranges run across every panel the maker has in the database, not only the matched ones.
What the sheets say
Dahua and Nanolumens overlap on 12 matched pairs between 3.077 and 3.906 mm; outside that band one of them has no comparable panel.
Dahua is the lighter cabinet in 12 of 12 matched pairs, Nanolumens in 0. Across their lineups that is 19 to 36 kg/m² against 25 to 51 kg/m².
Dahua draws less at full white in 12 of 12 matched pairs, Nanolumens in -2, and 2 are within 5%. Lineups: 331 to 680 W/m² against 383 to 808 W/m², which sets the circuit count.
Cabinet formats: Dahua builds in 600×337.5, 500×500, 640×480, 1000×500, 500×1000, 960×960 mm; Nanolumens in 240×150, 304.8×152.4, 300×168.8, 600×337.5, 500×500, 1200×675 mm. A shop that already owns one format keeps its bumpers and cases.
A hanging limit is published for none of its 57 panels by Dahua and for none of its 41 panels by Nanolumens; where it is not, the planner uses a conservative placeholder and says so.
Both publish a typical draw for every panel here, so the typical kilowatt figure rests on the sheets, not on an estimate.
Matched panels, side by side
Each pair is two panels of comparable pitch, one from each maker, with the same wall built from both.