Barco vs Unilumin
13 matched panels · 0.953 to 1.92 mm · specifications from both makers' datasheets
The two lineups side by side, then what the matched panels say about weight, power and what each maker publishes. Every figure is the maker's own; the planner adds nothing it cannot point to on a sheet.
| Barco | Unilumin |
|---|
| Panels listed | 10 | 11 |
| Pitch range | 0.953 to 1.92 mm | 0.95 to 2.6 mm |
| Cabinet formats | 400×450, 609.92×343.08 mm | 609.92×343.08, 500×500 mm |
| Weight | 36 to 40 kg/m² | 31 to 36 kg/m² |
| Maximum draw | 583 to 917 W/m² | 382 to 717 W/m² |
| Brightness | 600 to 1,800 nits | 600 to 1,000 nits |
| Hang limit published | 0 of 10 | 10 of 11 |
| Typical draw published | 9 of 10 | 11 of 11 |
Weight and draw are per square metre of cabinet, so different cabinet sizes compare fairly. Ranges run across every panel the maker has in the database, not only the matched ones.
What the sheets say
- Barco and Unilumin overlap on 13 matched pairs between 0.953 and 1.92 mm; outside that band one of them has no comparable panel.
- Barco is the lighter cabinet in 0 of 13 matched pairs, Unilumin in 12, and 1 is within 5%. Across their lineups that is 36 to 40 kg/m² against 31 to 36 kg/m².
- Barco draws less at full white in 4 of 13 matched pairs, Unilumin in 6, and 3 are within 5%. Lineups: 583 to 917 W/m² against 382 to 717 W/m², which sets the circuit count.
- Cabinet formats: Barco builds in 400×450, 609.92×343.08 mm; Unilumin in 609.92×343.08, 500×500 mm. A shop that already owns one format keeps its bumpers and cases.
- A hanging limit is published for none of its 10 panels by Barco and for 10 of its 11 panels by Unilumin; where it is not, the planner uses a conservative placeholder and says so.
- Typical draw is estimated as a third of the maximum where a sheet publishes no figure: Barco for 1 of 10, Unilumin for none.
Matched panels, side by side
Each pair is two panels of comparable pitch, one from each maker, with the same wall built from both.
More