8 matched panels · 4.808 to 4.808 mm · specifications from both makers' datasheets
The two lineups side by side, then what the matched panels say about weight, power and what each maker publishes. Every figure is the maker's own; the planner adds nothing it cannot point to on a sheet.
AET
ProLights
Panels listed
45
15
Pitch range
0.938 to 4.808 mm
2.604 to 6.667 mm
Cabinet formats
480×270, 600×337.5, 500×500, 480×540, 500×1000, 960×540 mm
500×500, 640×720, 500×1000 mm
Weight
21 to 54 kg/m²
23 to 36 kg/m²
Maximum draw
400 to 680 W/m²
480 to 901 W/m²
Brightness
550 to 5,500 nits
650 to 5,500 nits
Hang limit published
0 of 45
15 of 15
Typical draw published
45 of 45
15 of 15
Weight and draw are per square metre of cabinet, so different cabinet sizes compare fairly. Ranges run across every panel the maker has in the database, not only the matched ones.
What the sheets say
AET and ProLights overlap on 8 matched pairs between 4.808 and 4.808 mm; outside that band one of them has no comparable panel.
AET is the lighter cabinet in 2 of 8 matched pairs, ProLights in 6. Across their lineups that is 21 to 54 kg/m² against 23 to 36 kg/m².
AET draws less at full white in 6 of 8 matched pairs, ProLights in 2. Lineups: 400 to 680 W/m² against 480 to 901 W/m², which sets the circuit count.
Cabinet formats: AET builds in 480×270, 600×337.5, 500×500, 480×540, 500×1000, 960×540 mm; ProLights in 500×500, 640×720, 500×1000 mm. A shop that already owns one format keeps its bumpers and cases.
A hanging limit is published for none of its 45 panels by AET and for every one of its 15 panels by ProLights; where it is not, the planner uses a conservative placeholder and says so.
Both publish a typical draw for every panel here, so the typical kilowatt figure rests on the sheets, not on an estimate.
Matched panels, side by side
Each pair is two panels of comparable pitch, one from each maker, with the same wall built from both.