9 matched panels · 1.5 to 2.5 mm · specifications from both makers' datasheets
The two lineups side by side, then what the matched panels say about weight, power and what each maker publishes. Every figure is the maker's own; the planner adds nothing it cannot point to on a sheet.
Absen
Samsung
Panels listed
57
12
Pitch range
0.78 to 8.9 mm
0.84 to 6 mm
Cabinet formats
250×500, 240×540, 600×337.5, 500×500, 500×1000, 1000×500, 960×540, 1000×1000 mm
480×540, 480×720, 806.4×453.6, 1209.6×680.4 mm
Weight
19 to 38 kg/m²
21 to 31 kg/m²
Maximum draw
326 to 800 W/m²
321 to 772 W/m²
Brightness
800 to 5,500 nits
500 to 1,200 nits
Hang limit published
42 of 57
0 of 12
Typical draw published
57 of 57
12 of 12
Weight and draw are per square metre of cabinet, so different cabinet sizes compare fairly. Ranges run across every panel the maker has in the database, not only the matched ones.
What the sheets say
Absen and Samsung overlap on 9 matched pairs between 1.5 and 2.5 mm; outside that band one of them has no comparable panel.
Absen is the lighter cabinet in 1 of 9 matched pairs, Samsung in 8. Across their lineups that is 19 to 38 kg/m² against 21 to 31 kg/m².
Absen draws less at full white in 2 of 9 matched pairs, Samsung in 5, and 2 are within 5%. Lineups: 326 to 800 W/m² against 321 to 772 W/m², which sets the circuit count.
Cabinet formats: Absen builds in 250×500, 240×540, 600×337.5, 500×500, 500×1000, 1000×500, 960×540, 1000×1000 mm; Samsung in 480×540, 480×720, 806.4×453.6, 1209.6×680.4 mm. A shop that already owns one format keeps its bumpers and cases.
A hanging limit is published for 42 of its 57 panels by Absen and for none of its 12 panels by Samsung; where it is not, the planner uses a conservative placeholder and says so.
Both publish a typical draw for every panel here, so the typical kilowatt figure rests on the sheets, not on an estimate.
Matched panels, side by side
Each pair is two panels of comparable pitch, one from each maker, with the same wall built from both.