LG LSCC015 vs ROE Visual RB1.5F

1.56 mm against 1.56 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 7.80 × 4.39 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

• Both resolve to about the same density (409,600 and 409,600 pixels per square metre), so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
• LG LSCC015 is the lighter rig: 25 kg/m² against 36 kg/m². Across this wall that is 375 kg of difference, 1,010 kg versus 1,385 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
• ROE Visual RB1.5F draws more: 960 W/m² against 553 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 18.9 kW versus 34.6 kW, and 7 versus 16 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
• Data is lighter on ROE Visual RB1.5F: 32 runs against 39, at 6 and 5 panels per port respectively (60 Hz, 8-bit, ports loaded to 80%). Fewer runs means fewer home runs to pull and fewer processor ports to find.
• Different cabinet formats: 600 × 337.5 mm against 500 × 500 mm, so 169 tiles versus 144 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
• Estimated truck space: 6.5 m for ROE Visual RB1.5F against 7.5 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Full specifications

• LG LSCC015: specs and calculator
• ROE Visual RB1.5F: specs and calculator
• All LG panels
• All ROE Visual panels

Related comparisons

• Absen SA1.5 vs ROE Visual RB1.5F
• INFiLED IRDB1.5mk2 Ultra MT2 vs ROE Visual RB1.5F
• INFiLED IRDB1.56mk2 MT2 CBSF vs ROE Visual RB1.5F
• Desay X1.5i vs ROE Visual RB1.5F
• Glux TVsn15 vs ROE Visual RB1.5F
• LG LSCB015 vs ROE Visual RB1.5F