RigPlan
Wall in. Truck list out.

INFiLED IRDB1.5mk2 Ultra MT2 vs ROE Visual RB1.5F

1.56 mm against 1.56 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile — so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

INFiLED IRDB1.5mk2 Ultra MT2ROE Visual RB1.5F
ManufacturerINFiLEDROE Visual
Pixel pitch1.56 mm1.56 mm
Cabinet500 × 500 mm500 × 500 mm
Pixels per cabinet320 × 320320 × 320
Pixels per m²409,600409,600
Weight8.4 kg (34 kg/m²)9.06 kg (36 kg/m²)
Max power120 W (480 W/m²)240 W (960 W/m²)
Typical power40 W120 W
Max hangnot published20 panels

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

INFiLED IRDB1.5mk2 Ultra MT2ROE Visual RB1.5F
Wall built16 × 9 — 8.00 × 4.50 m16 × 9 — 8.00 × 4.50 m
Panels needed144 + 8 spare144 + 8 spare
Resolution5,120 × 2,880 px5,120 × 2,880 px
Weight incl. bumpers1,410 kg1,505 kg
Load per point~564 kg across 3~602 kg across 3
Power, full white17.3 kW34.6 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)816
Data runs32 at ≤5/port32 at ≤5/port
Truck, linear6.5 m6.5 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile — 8.00 × 4.50 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else — or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons