RigPlan.app

Blizzard IRiS InSignia IP4 vs Nanolumens Performance 500 4.8

4.808 mm against 4.808 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

This page puts the two sheets side by side, then builds the same wall from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs.

Specifications

Blizzard IRiS InSignia IP4Nanolumens Performance 500 4.8
ManufacturerBlizzard IRiSNanolumens
Pixel pitch4.808 mm4.808 mm
Cabinet1000 × 1000 mm500 × 500 mm
Brightness5,000 nits5,500 nits
Refresh rate3,840 Hznot published
Viewing anglenot published140° / 140°
Pixels per cabinet208 × 208104 × 104
Pixels per m²43,26443,264
Weight31 kg (31 kg/m²)9.18 kg (37 kg/m²)
Max power800 W (800 W/m²)163 W (652 W/m²)
Typical power267 W*50 W
Max hangnot publishednot published

* Average draw estimated as max ÷ 3; this manufacturer publishes no average figure.

The same wall, built from each closest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

Blizzard IRiS InSignia IP4Nanolumens Performance 500 4.8
Wall built8 × 5, 8.00 × 5.00 m16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m
Panels needed40 + 2 spare144 + 8 spare
Resolution1,664 × 1,040 px1,664 × 936 px
Weight incl. bumpers1,340 kg1,522 kg
Load per point~536 kg across 3~609 kg across 3
Power, full white32 kW23.5 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)158
Data runs4 at ≤12/port4 at ≤48/port
Truck, linear5.4 m5.8 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 5.00 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

For other panels, or your own OEM tile, the comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons