RigPlan.app

Blizzard IRiS InSignia 2.9 vs Nanolumens Performance 500 2.9

2.976 mm against 2.976 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

This page puts the two sheets side by side, then builds the same wall from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs.

Specifications

Blizzard IRiS InSignia 2.9Nanolumens Performance 500 2.9
ManufacturerBlizzard IRiSNanolumens
Pixel pitch2.976 mm2.976 mm
Cabinet500 × 500 mm500 × 500 mm
Brightness800 nits5,000 nits
Refresh rate3,840 Hznot published
Viewing anglenot published140° / 140°
Pixels per cabinet168 × 168168 × 168
Pixels per m²112,896112,896
Weight5.8 kg (23 kg/m²)9.18 kg (37 kg/m²)
Max power150 W (600 W/m²)163 W (652 W/m²)
Typical power50 W*50 W
Max hangnot publishednot published

* Average draw estimated as max ÷ 3; this manufacturer publishes no average figure.

The same wall, built from each closest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

Blizzard IRiS InSignia 2.9Nanolumens Performance 500 2.9
Wall built16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m
Panels needed144 + 8 spare144 + 8 spare
Resolution2,688 × 1,512 px2,688 × 1,512 px
Weight incl. bumpers1,035 kg1,522 kg
Load per point~414 kg across 3~609 kg across 3
Power, full white21.6 kW23.5 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)88
Data runs8 at ≤18/port8 at ≤18/port
Truck, linear5.8 m5.8 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 4.50 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

For other panels, or your own OEM tile, the comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons