RigPlan.app

Glux BAtn6 vs Nanolumens Nixel 6 Flex

6.9 mm against 6.35 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

Glux BAtn6Nanolumens Nixel 6 Flex
ManufacturerGluxNanolumens
Pixel pitch6.9 mm6.35 mm
Cabinet1000 × 500 mm304.8 × 152.4 mm
Brightness5,000 nits1,800 nits
Refresh rate3,000 Hznot published
Viewing angle140° / 140°170° / 160°
Pixels per cabinet144 × 7248 × 24
Pixels per m²20,73624,800
Weight4.8 kg (10 kg/m²)1.25 kg (27 kg/m²)
Max power300 W (600 W/m²)20.9 W (450 W/m²)
Typical power150 W6.3 W
Max hangnot publishednot published

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

Glux BAtn6Nanolumens Nixel 6 Flex
Wall built8 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m25 × 28, 7.62 × 4.27 m
Panels needed72 + 4 spare700 + 35 spare
Resolution1,152 × 648 px1,200 × 672 px
Weight incl. bumpers446 kg1,190 kg
Load per point~178 kg across 3~476 kg across 3
Power, full white21.6 kW14.6 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)85
Data runs2 at ≤50/port2 at ≤451/port
Truck, linear3.3 m25.4 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 4.50 m and 7.62 × 4.27 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons