RigPlan.app

Glux BAtn15 vs Unilumin Usurface III 16.67 (1200×1200)

15.6 mm against 16.67 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

Glux BAtn15Unilumin Usurface III 16.67 (1200×1200)
ManufacturerGluxUnilumin
Pixel pitch15.6 mm16.67 mm
Cabinet1000 × 500 mm1200 × 1200 mm
Brightness5,000 nits6,500 nits
Refresh rate3,000 Hz3,840 Hz
Viewing angle140° / 140°140° / 120°
Pixels per cabinet64 × 3272 × 72
Pixels per m²4,0963,600
Weight4.8 kg (10 kg/m²)71.1 kg (49 kg/m²)
Max power300 W (600 W/m²)936 W (650 W/m²)
Typical power150 W312 W
Max hangnot publishednot published

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

Glux BAtn15Unilumin Usurface III 16.67 (1200×1200)
Wall built8 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m8 × 5, 9.60 × 6.00 m
Panels needed72 + 4 spare40 + 2 spare
Resolution512 × 288 px576 × 360 px
Weight incl. bumpers446 kg2,944 kg
Load per point~178 kg across 3~883 kg across 4
Power, full white21.6 kW37.4 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)815
Data runs1 at ≤253/port1 at ≤100/port
Truck, linear3.3 m5.4 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 4.50 m and 9.60 × 6.00 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons