Desay M16 vs Unilumin Usurface III 16.67 (1200×1200)

16.667 mm against 16.67 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 4.50 m and 9.60 × 6.00 m respectively.

What the numbers say

• Both resolve to about the same density (3,600 and 3,600 pixels per square metre), so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
• Desay M16 is the lighter rig: 22 kg/m² against 49 kg/m². Across this wall that is 2,019 kg of difference, 925 kg versus 2,944 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
• Unilumin Usurface III 16.67 (1200×1200) draws more: 650 W/m² against 531 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 19.1 kW versus 37.4 kW, and 10 versus 15 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
• Both come out at 1 data runs for this wall, though they carry 200 and 100 panels per port respectively.
• Different cabinet formats: 800 × 900 mm against 1200 × 1200 mm, so 50 tiles versus 40 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
• Estimated truck space: 2.9 m for Desay M16 against 5.4 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Full specifications

• Desay M16: specs and calculator
• Unilumin Usurface III 16.67 (1200×1200): specs and calculator
• All Desay panels
• All Unilumin panels

Related comparisons

• Desay M16 vs Glux BAtn15
• Glux BAtn15 vs Unilumin Usurface III 16.67 (1200×1200)