RigPlan.app

Digital Projection RCS-C 2.6 Medium vs ROE Visual GP2.6

2.604 mm against 2.604 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

Digital Projection RCS-C 2.6 MediumROE Visual GP2.6
ManufacturerDigital ProjectionROE Visual
Pixel pitch2.604 mm2.604 mm
Cabinet500 × 750 mm500 × 1000 mm
Brightness800 nits1,500 nits
Refresh rate3,840 Hz7,680 Hz
Viewing angle160° / 140°160° / 140°
Pixels per cabinet192 × 288192 × 384
Pixels per m²147,456147,456
Weight10 kg (27 kg/m²)9 kg (18 kg/m²)
Max power410 W (1093 W/m²)320 W (640 W/m²)
Typical power136 W160 W
Max hangnot published12 panels

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

Digital Projection RCS-C 2.6 MediumROE Visual GP2.6
Wall built16 × 6, 8.00 × 4.50 m16 × 5, 8.00 × 5.00 m
Panels needed96 + 5 spare80 + 4 spare
Resolution3,072 × 1,728 px3,072 × 1,920 px
Weight incl. bumpers1,160 kg920 kg
Load per point~464 kg across 3~368 kg across 3
Power, full white39.4 kW25.6 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)1610
Data runs16 at ≤9/port16 at ≤7/port
Truck, linear5.2 m4.6 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 4.50 m and 8.00 × 5.00 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons