RigPlan.app

Digital Projection Performance 0.9 COB vs Philips (PPDS) 27HDL5193IP

0.9375 mm against 0.9375 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

Digital Projection Performance 0.9 COBPhilips (PPDS) 27HDL5193IP
ManufacturerDigital ProjectionPhilips (PPDS)
Pixel pitch0.9375 mm0.9375 mm
Cabinet600 × 337.5 mm600 × 337.5 mm
Brightness1,200 nits600 nits
Refresh rate3,840 Hz3,840 Hz
Viewing angle160° / 160°160° / 160°
Pixels per cabinet640 × 360640 × 360
Pixels per m²1,137,7781,137,778
Weight4.58 kg (23 kg/m²)4.7 kg (23 kg/m²)
Max power154 W (760 W/m²)86 W (425 W/m²)
Typical power46 W45 W
Max hangnot publishednot published

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

Digital Projection Performance 0.9 COBPhilips (PPDS) 27HDL5193IP
Wall built13 × 13, 7.80 × 4.39 m13 × 13, 7.80 × 4.39 m
Panels needed169 + 9 spare169 + 9 spare
Resolution8,320 × 4,680 px8,320 × 4,680 px
Weight incl. bumpers939 kg959 kg
Load per point~376 kg across 3~384 kg across 3
Power, full white26 kW14.5 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)137
Data runs91 at ≤2/port91 at ≤2/port
Truck, linear9 m9 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 7.80 × 4.39 m and 7.80 × 4.39 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons