RigPlan.app

Digital Projection Performance 0.7 COB vs Philips (PPDS) 27HDL5178IP

0.781 mm against 0.78125 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

Digital Projection Performance 0.7 COBPhilips (PPDS) 27HDL5178IP
ManufacturerDigital ProjectionPhilips (PPDS)
Pixel pitch0.781 mm0.78125 mm
Cabinet600 × 337.5 mm600 × 337.5 mm
Brightness1,200 nits600 nits
Refresh rate3,840 Hz3,840 Hz
Viewing angle160° / 160°160° / 160°
Pixels per cabinet768 × 432768 × 432
Pixels per m²1,638,4001,638,400
Weight4.58 kg (23 kg/m²)4.7 kg (23 kg/m²)
Max power162 W (800 W/m²)75 W (370 W/m²)
Typical power49 W30 W
Max hangnot publishednot published

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

Digital Projection Performance 0.7 COBPhilips (PPDS) 27HDL5178IP
Wall built13 × 13, 7.80 × 4.39 m13 × 13, 7.80 × 4.39 m
Panels needed169 + 9 spare169 + 9 spare
Resolution9,984 × 5,616 px9,984 × 5,616 px
Weight incl. bumpers939 kg959 kg
Load per point~376 kg across 3~384 kg across 3
Power, full white27.4 kW12.7 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)135
Data runs169 at ≤1/port169 at ≤1/port
Truck, linear10.6 m10.8 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 7.80 × 4.39 m and 7.80 × 4.39 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons