RigPlan.app

Dahua DHI-PHGIA4.81-SH vs INFiLED IRAR4.8mk2

4.808 mm against 4.81 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

Dahua DHI-PHGIA4.81-SHINFiLED IRAR4.8mk2
ManufacturerDahuaINFiLED
Pixel pitch4.808 mm4.81 mm
Cabinet500 × 1000 mm500 × 1000 mm
Brightness1,000 nits1,000 nits
Refresh rate3,840 Hz3,840 Hz
Viewing angle160° / 140°160° / 160°
Pixels per cabinet104 × 208104 × 208
Pixels per m²43,26443,264
Weight11.45 kg (23 kg/m²)12.5 kg (25 kg/m²)
Max power210 W (420 W/m²)360 W (720 W/m²)
Typical power65 W120 W
Max hangnot published20 panels

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

Dahua DHI-PHGIA4.81-SHINFiLED IRAR4.8mk2
Wall built16 × 5, 8.00 × 5.00 m16 × 5, 8.00 × 5.00 m
Panels needed80 + 4 spare80 + 4 spare
Resolution1,664 × 1,040 px1,664 × 1,040 px
Weight incl. bumpers1,116 kg1,200 kg
Load per point~446 kg across 3~480 kg across 3
Power, full white16.8 kW28.8 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)810
Data runs4 at ≤24/port4 at ≤24/port
Truck, linear4.2 m4.2 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 5.00 m and 8.00 × 5.00 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons