RigPlan.app

AET QC 2.976 Outdoor (500×1000) vs Hikvision DS-D4629CE22-1AB

2.976 mm against 2.976 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

AET QC 2.976 Outdoor (500×1000)Hikvision DS-D4629CE22-1AB
ManufacturerAETHikvision
Pixel pitch2.976 mm2.976 mm
Cabinet500 × 1000 mm500 × 500 mm
Brightness4,000 nits1,000 nits
Refresh rate3,840 Hz7,680 Hz
Viewing angle140° / 140°160° / 140°
Pixels per cabinet168 × 336168 × 168
Pixels per m²112,896112,896
Weight13 kg (26 kg/m²)7.4 kg (30 kg/m²)
Max power325 W (650 W/m²)115 W (460 W/m²)
Typical power110 W39 W
Max hangnot publishednot published

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

AET QC 2.976 Outdoor (500×1000)Hikvision DS-D4629CE22-1AB
Wall built16 × 5, 8.00 × 5.00 m16 × 9, 8.00 × 4.50 m
Panels needed80 + 4 spare144 + 8 spare
Resolution2,688 × 1,680 px2,688 × 1,512 px
Weight incl. bumpers1,240 kg1,266 kg
Load per point~496 kg across 3~506 kg across 3
Power, full white26 kW16.6 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)108
Data runs16 at ≤9/port8 at ≤18/port
Truck, linear6 m5.8 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 5.00 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons