AET Koala KL19AA52 vs LEDitgo 496-2,0

2 mm against 2.067 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

This page puts the two sheets side by side, then builds the same wall from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs.

Specifications

	AET Koala KL19AA52	LEDitgo 496-2,0
Manufacturer	AET	LEDitgo
Pixel pitch	2 mm	2.067 mm
Cabinet	480 × 270 mm	496 × 496 mm
Brightness	700 nits	1,000 nits
Refresh rate	3,840 Hz	3,840 Hz
Viewing angle	160° / 160°	170° / 170°
Pixels per cabinet	240 × 135	240 × 240
Pixels per m²	250,000	234,131
Weight	3.4 kg (26 kg/m²)	7.5 kg (30 kg/m²)
Max power	58 W (448 W/m²)	180 W (732 W/m²)
Typical power	19 W	80 W
Max hang	not published	not published

The same wall, built from each closest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

	AET Koala KL19AA52	LEDitgo 496-2,0
Wall built	17 × 17, 8.16 × 4.59 m	16 × 9, 7.94 × 4.46 m
Panels needed	289 + 15 spare	144 + 8 spare
Resolution	4,080 × 2,295 px	3,840 × 2,160 px
Weight incl. bumpers	1,198 kg	1,280 kg
Load per point	~479 kg across 3	~512 kg across 3
Power, full white	16.8 kW	25.9 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)	9	9
Data runs	34 at ≤16/port	16 at ≤9/port
Truck, linear	11.9 m	6 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.16 × 4.59 m and 7.94 × 4.46 m respectively.

What the numbers say

AET Koala KL19AA52 resolves finer: 250,000 pixels per square metre against 234,131 for LEDitgo 496-2,0, 7% more. On a 8 m wide wall that is 4,080 px across versus 3,840 px.
AET Koala KL19AA52 is the lighter rig: 26 kg/m² against 30 kg/m². Across this wall that is 82 kg of difference, 1,198 kg versus 1,280 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
LEDitgo 496-2,0 draws more: 732 W/m² against 448 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 16.8 kW versus 25.9 kW, and 9 versus 9 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
Data is lighter on LEDitgo 496-2,0: 16 runs against 34, at 16 and 9 panels per port respectively (60 Hz, 8-bit, ports loaded to 80%). Fewer runs means fewer home runs to pull and fewer processor ports to find.
Different cabinet formats: 480 × 270 mm against 496 × 496 mm, so 289 tiles versus 144 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
Estimated truck space: 6 m for LEDitgo 496-2,0 against 11.9 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

For other panels, or your own OEM tile, the comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

AET Koala KL19AA52 vs LEDitgo 496-2,0

Specifications

The same wall, built from each closest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

What the numbers say

Full specifications

Related comparisons