Absen PL3.9 Pro V10 vs YES TECH MT II (1000×500)
3.9 mm against 3.9 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets
Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile — so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.
Specifications
| Absen PL3.9 Pro V10 | YES TECH MT II (1000×500) |
|---|
| Manufacturer | Absen | YES TECH |
| Pixel pitch | 3.9 mm | 3.9 mm |
| Cabinet | 500 × 500 mm | 1000 × 500 mm |
| Pixels per cabinet | 128 × 128 | 256 × 64 |
| Pixels per m² | 65,536 | 32,768 |
| Weight | 8.4 kg (34 kg/m²) | 7.9 kg (16 kg/m²) |
| Max power | 170 W (680 W/m²) | 225 W (450 W/m²) |
| Typical power | 58 W | 68 W |
| Max hang | 20 panels | not published |
The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit
| Absen PL3.9 Pro V10 | YES TECH MT II (1000×500) |
|---|
| Wall built | 16 × 9 — 8.00 × 4.50 m | 8 × 9 — 8.00 × 4.50 m |
| Panels needed | 144 + 8 spare | 72 + 4 spare |
| Resolution | 2,048 × 1,152 px | 2,048 × 576 px |
| Weight incl. bumpers | 1,410 kg | 669 kg |
| Load per point | ~564 kg across 3 | ~268 kg across 3 |
| Power, full white | 24.5 kW | 16.2 kW |
| Circuits (16 A/230 V) | 9 | 8 |
| Data runs | 6 at ≤31/port | 3 at ≤31/port |
| Truck, linear | 5.8 m | 4 m |
Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile — 8.00 × 4.50 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.
What the numbers say
- Absen PL3.9 Pro V10 resolves finer: 65,536 pixels per square metre against 32,768 for YES TECH MT II (1000×500), 100% more. On a 8 m wide wall that is 2,048 px across versus 2,048 px.
- YES TECH MT II (1000×500) is the lighter rig: 16 kg/m² against 34 kg/m². Across this wall that is 741 kg of difference — 669 kg versus 1,410 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
- Absen PL3.9 Pro V10 draws more: 680 W/m² against 450 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 24.5 kW versus 16.2 kW, and 9 versus 8 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
- Data is lighter on YES TECH MT II (1000×500): 3 runs against 6, at 31 and 31 panels per port respectively (60 Hz, 8-bit, ports loaded to 80%). Fewer runs means fewer home runs to pull and fewer processor ports to find.
- Different cabinet formats: 500 × 500 mm against 1000 × 500 mm, so 144 tiles versus 72 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
- Estimated truck space: 4 m for YES TECH MT II (1000×500) against 5.8 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.
Comparing something else — or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.
Open these two in the toolFull specifications
Related comparisons