Absen JP5 Pro 1000×1000 vs Leyard CLO5.2

5.2 mm against 5.2 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 8.00 × 5.00 m and 8.00 × 4.50 m respectively.

What the numbers say

• Both resolve to about the same density (36,864 and 36,864 pixels per square metre), so pick on weight, power or what your shop already owns rather than on image detail.
• Leyard CLO5.2 is the lighter rig: 20 kg/m² against 30 kg/m². Across this wall that is 360 kg of difference, 920 kg versus 1,280 kg, which moves point loads and can change the hoist call.
• Leyard CLO5.2 draws more: 1200 W/m² against 690 W/m² at full white. For this wall that is 27.6 kW versus 43.2 kW, and 10 versus 16 circuits at a 16 A/230 V supply with an 80% derate.
• Data is lighter on Leyard CLO5.2: 3 runs against 4, at 14 and 56 panels per port respectively (60 Hz, 8-bit, ports loaded to 80%). Fewer runs means fewer home runs to pull and fewer processor ports to find.
• Different cabinet formats: 1000 × 1000 mm against 500 × 500 mm, so 40 tiles versus 144 for the same wall. Fewer, larger cabinets build faster; smaller ones give finer control over wall dimensions and are easier to handle alone.
• Estimated truck space: 3.3 m for Absen JP5 Pro 1000×1000 against 5.8 m for the other, including spares, cases and cabling.

Full specifications

• Absen JP5 Pro 1000×1000: specs and calculator
• Leyard CLO5.2: specs and calculator
• All Absen panels
• All Leyard panels

Related comparisons

• Absen JP5 Pro vs Planar CLI5.2-F
• Absen JP5 Pro vs Glux ODsn5.2
• Absen JP5 Pro vs Leyard CLI5.2
• Absen JP5 Pro vs Desay X5.2
• Absen JP5 Pro vs Leyard CLO5.2
• Leyard CLO5.2 vs Planar CLI5.2-F