RigPlan

PixelFLEX FLEXUltra XT 1.5 vs Sharp LD-FE153

1.5 mm against 1.5 mm · specifications from both manufacturers' datasheets

Side-by-side specifications, then the same wall built from each tile, so the comparison is in panels, kilograms, circuits and data runs rather than in marketing copy.

Specifications

PixelFLEX FLEXUltra XT 1.5Sharp LD-FE153
ManufacturerPixelFLEXSharp
Pixel pitch1.5 mm1.5 mm
Cabinet608 × 342 mm608 × 342 mm
Brightness600 nits700 nits
Refresh rate3,000 Hz3,840 Hz
Viewing angle170° / 160°170° / 160°
Pixels per cabinet384 × 216384 × 216
Pixels per m²398,892398,892
Weight8 kg (38 kg/m²)8.8 kg (42 kg/m²)
Max power94 W (452 W/m²)38 W (183 W/m²)
Typical power31 W*22 W
Max hangnot publishednot published

* Average draw estimated as max ÷ 3; this manufacturer publishes no average figure.

The same wall, built from eachclosest 16:9 / 16:10 near 8 m wide, flown, EU power, 60 Hz 8-bit

PixelFLEX FLEXUltra XT 1.5Sharp LD-FE153
Wall built13 × 13, 7.90 × 4.45 m13 × 13, 7.90 × 4.45 m
Panels needed169 + 9 spare169 + 9 spare
Resolution4,992 × 2,808 px4,992 × 2,808 px
Weight incl. bumpers1,517 kg1,652 kg
Load per point~607 kg across 3~661 kg across 3
Power, full white15.9 kW6.4 kW
Circuits (16 A/230 V)73
Data runs39 at ≤6/port39 at ≤6/port
Truck, linear7.5 m7.5 m

Whole cabinets rarely hit an identical size, so each wall is the closest build to a real video format (16:9 or 16:10) near 8 m wide for that tile: 7.90 × 4.45 m and 7.90 × 4.45 m respectively.

What the numbers say

Comparing something else, or your own OEM tile? The comparison tool takes any panels, up to four at once, at your wall size. Add your own spec once in the calculator and it appears there alongside the catalogue.

Open these two in the tool

Full specifications

Related comparisons